3 ms·

(Also submitted here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43822992 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43822992) Neat, though I expected every individual boa

(Also submitted here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43822992 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43822992) Neat, though I expected every individual board to have "turns" - I didn't expect that I could just pick a random board, liberate the black queen, and have her clean up every single white piece on the board without my "opponent" getting to do anything in return.

tantalor 2y ago
Agreed. It doesn't make sense. The game here is not to play chess, it is to find a board that has no other player and wipe them out as fast as possible.
- krupan 2y ago
  Or it's just to have fun and create stuff. Already someone made board full of rooks and called it Rooklyn, and another person made a board full of queens and called it Queens
- NooneAtAll3 2y ago
  the game here is to have fun :) get the most kills, make a cool shape or take a piece veeeeery far away from home
eieio 2y ago
oh huh, I'm not sure why this one made it to the front page and not the link to my site! Anyway, yeah, I guess I could have gone with turns here but I thought that building a more realtime MMO thing where pieces could cross boards would be a little more interesting and novel. I also didn't feel like a version of this that was turn based would ever complete. certainly a queen can go wipe out a whole board, but the game tries to place you next to other active players when you join, which hopefully promotes some interesting counterplay to that. And I think playing chess in realtime like this against someone is pretty fun. But I understand why it might not be for everyone!
- JusticeJuice 2y ago
  I'd love to know what individual piece has moved the furthest from it's starting point.
- chunkles 2y ago
  Individuals here on hacker news tend to gravitate towards blog posts about games rather than links to actual games, generally. Not a hard fast rule, but it's what I've observed over the years.
  - eieio 2y ago
    I have had some success on Hacker News with similar games before[1]! But I'll certainly do a proper writeup of the tech behind this one because I think it's pretty neat. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40800869 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40800869 for example
  - stevage 2y ago
    As I get older, I find I'm often more interested in reading about things than trying the thing myself. I often go straight to the comments about articles rather than even reading them.
- dang 2y ago
  As you wish! We've swapped out the link from https://eieio.games/blog/one-million-chessboards/ https://eieio.games/blog/one-million-chessboards/ to your site. But I also put the blog link in the top text, so hopefully readers will look at both. (Oh and I still owe you an email. I haven't forgotten!)
  - eieio 2y ago
    Ah thank you dang! I meant to submit a Show HN for this one with a little context/a few technical details, but someone beat me to submitting the link. So this is perfect :) (and thanks, I'm in no rush!!)
- deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]

tantalor 2y ago

Agreed. It doesn't make sense. The game here is not to play chess, it is to find a board that has no other player and wipe them out as fast as possible.

krupan 2y ago
Or it's just to have fun and create stuff. Already someone made board full of rooks and called it Rooklyn, and another person made a board full of queens and called it Queens
NooneAtAll3 2y ago
the game here is to have fun :) get the most kills, make a cool shape or take a piece veeeeery far away from home

eieio 2y ago

oh huh, I'm not sure why this one made it to the front page and not the link to my site! Anyway, yeah, I guess I could have gone with turns here but I thought that building a more realtime MMO thing where pieces could cross boards would be a little more interesting and novel. I also didn't feel like a version of this that was turn based would ever complete. certainly a queen can go wipe out a whole board, but the game tries to place you next to other active players when you join, which hopefully promotes some interesting counterplay to that. And I think playing chess in realtime like this against someone is pretty fun. But I understand why it might not be for everyone!

JusticeJuice 2y ago
I'd love to know what individual piece has moved the furthest from it's starting point.
chunkles 2y ago
Individuals here on hacker news tend to gravitate towards blog posts about games rather than links to actual games, generally. Not a hard fast rule, but it's what I've observed over the years.
- eieio 2y ago
  I have had some success on Hacker News with similar games before[1]! But I'll certainly do a proper writeup of the tech behind this one because I think it's pretty neat. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40800869 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40800869 for example
- stevage 2y ago
  As I get older, I find I'm often more interested in reading about things than trying the thing myself. I often go straight to the comments about articles rather than even reading them.
dang 2y ago
As you wish! We've swapped out the link from https://eieio.games/blog/one-million-chessboards/ https://eieio.games/blog/one-million-chessboards/ to your site. But I also put the blog link in the top text, so hopefully readers will look at both. (Oh and I still owe you an email. I haven't forgotten!)
- eieio 2y ago
  Ah thank you dang! I meant to submit a Show HN for this one with a little context/a few technical details, but someone beat me to submitting the link. So this is perfect :) (and thanks, I'm in no rush!!)
deleted 2y ago
[deleted]