3 ms·
I don't see any actual problems in your list. 1. This is not a problem but a feature request that initially is not covered by the proposal (ie no pseudonyms)
by jklinger410 1y ago
I don't see any actual problems in your list.
1. This is not a problem but a feature request that initially is not covered by the proposal (ie no pseudonyms)
2. This is not a relevant problem (red herring) because stealing an identity is already illegal
3. The same password or identity recovering steps as usual (see: FSAID)
- pavel_lishin 1y ago1. I think that it's sufficiently important to be in version 1.0; this isn't like that truck that doesn't come with paint or an entertainment system. 2. I disagree. If the point of the proposed solution is to prevent bots from impersonating humans, it's gotta have some mechanism to actually solve that problem - and if a human can hand over the keys to their identity to a bot, then the solution absolutely does not solve the problem. (And identity theft was only one of the ways a bot could get a human's identity.)