3 ms·
> The models/products aren’t reliable enough. People aren't reliable enough. Nature isn't reliable enough. For most uses, all that is needed is a system to h
by hu3 2y ago
> The models/products aren’t reliable enough.
People aren't reliable enough.
Nature isn't reliable enough.
For most uses, all that is needed is a system to handle cases where it is not reliable enough.
Then suddenly it becomes reliable enough.
- th0ma5 2y agoThere are different kinds of reliable. There is the reliability of certain failure for instance. These things are unreliable in a way that the other things that you listed are not.
- Juliate 2y agoNature is reliable in that we have rules (physics) and practices (engineering) to base our process upon. People aren't reliable, for a specific value of reliable. We expect of technology(machines, software, AI, whatever) to be: deterministically reliable (knowing their failure modes), and significantly more reliable than humans at what they do (because that's what we rely upon, why we use them to replace humans at what they, in ways humans can't: harder, faster, stronger).
- void-pointer 2y agoA computer can never be held accountable. Therefore, a computer must never make a management decision.