3 ms·
Why would it be unlikely that the person committing fraud is under the influence? There's no reason to assume that.
by terrib1e 1y ago
Why would it be unlikely that the person committing fraud is under the influence? There's no reason to assume that.
- quantumgarbage 1y agoSome states have "alcohol-exclusion laws" which make it possible for insurers to deny coverage if you had a car accident while intoxicated. I guess that might be one explanation?
- analog31 1y agoBecause they know that a cop is about to show up, is my guess.
- cratermoon 1y agoI read that as assuming the fraudsters were professionals in a sense, i.e. doing it in an organized way. Wouldn't those kinds of criminals try to keep it looking clean?