2 ms·

The legal question (that was settled by a recent case) was whether the word woman in existing legislation includes transwomen. The particular case was primarily

The legal question (that was settled by a recent case) was whether the word woman in existing legislation includes transwomen. The particular case was primarily whether transwomen could qualify for preference given to women for certain posts "on the boards of certain public authorities in Scotland". https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/judgments/uksc-2024-0042 https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/judgments/uksc-2024-0042 The toilets things getting the publicity is more a matter of the media being obsessed with that aspect of it. Obviously there are implications for that, but also for many other things.

red_admiral 2y ago
The EHRC [1] (Equality and Human Rights Commission) has issued guidance [2] that suggests public toilets could be affected. In practice I think life will go on as usual in any organisation that's not explicitly anti-trans, but there's a risk that someone will make a statement by suing a venue for sex discrimination. As far as I know, the judgement affects much wider issues than just the women's "quota" on boardrooms in Scotland. It seems like a lot of major employers and their lawyers are trying to understand the implications and promising they'll have a update for everyone "soon". [1] https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/equality-and-human-rights-commission https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/equality-and-hum... [2] https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/media-centre/interim-update-practical-implications-uk-supreme-court-judgment https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/media-centre/interim-upd...