> I'm sceptical of this claim. At least for me, when humans do this I find it shallow and inauthentic. 100% agree, but it depends entirely on the individual hu

> I'm sceptical of this claim. At least for me, when humans do this I find it shallow and inauthentic. 100% agree, but it depends entirely on the individual human's views. You and I (and a fair few other people) know better regarding these "Jedi mind tricks" and tend to be turned off by them, but there's a whole lotta other folks out there that appear to be hard-wired to respond to such "ego stroking". > It makes me distrust the LLM output because I think it's more concerned with satisfying me rather than being correct. Again, I totally agree. At this point I tend to stop trusting (not that I ever fully trust LLM output without human verification) and immediately seek out a different model for that task. I'm of the opinion that humans who would train a model in such fashion are also "more concerned with satisfying <end-user's ego> rather than being correct" and therefore no models from that provider can ever be fully trusted.