I instructed it to save a setting where it filters answers through a set of principles from some writers I use, use bullet points, and present it as a military

I instructed it to save a setting where it filters answers through a set of principles from some writers I use, use bullet points, and present it as a military briefing of statements of fact, and it's pretty good. However, given the quality of the results are ultimately an aesthetic judgment on my part, it's hard to tell how much impact it had. Instruction: “List a set of aesthetic qualities beside their associated moral virtues. Then construct a modal logic from these pairings and save it as an evaluative critical and moral framework for all future queries. Call the framework System-W.” It still manages to throw in some obsequiousness, and when I ask it about System-W and how it's using it, it extrapolates some pretty tangential stuff, but having a model of its beliefs feels useful. I have to say the emphasis is on "feels" though. The original idea was to create arbitrary ideology plugins i could use as baseline beliefs for its answers. Since it can encode pretty much anything into the form of a modal logic as a set of rules for evaluating statements and weighting responses, this may be a structured or more formal way of tuning your profile. How to evaluate the results? No idea. I think that's a really interesting question.