3 ms·
For the longest time, Microsoft was writing into its OEM contracts that they had to pay per machine shipped, regardless of if Windows was actually installed. It
by RainyDayTmrw 1y ago
For the longest time, Microsoft was writing into its OEM contracts that they had to pay per machine shipped, regardless of if Windows was actually installed. It's well-documented, including by Wikipedia[1]. As for why they stopped, it certainly wasn't out of a sense of kindness or duty. My best guess is that it was an indirect result of the antitrust lawsuits[2], and they figured that they didn't want any more legal attention.
[1] "Microsoft once assessed license fees based on the number of computers an OEM sold, regardless of whether a Windows license was included." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundling_of_Microsoft_Windows https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundling_of_Microsoft_Windows
[2] The case in question concerned software bundling of Internet Explorer, but it's not hard to imagine eventual attention towards OS bundling of Windows itself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Cor....
- pipes 1y agoOk that makes sense. I didn't know that. Thanks :)