3 ms·
This is a big "duh" to me and I see very little value in this post. As far as Google's control extends, I can't think of anything they could implement without
by runjake 14y ago
This is a big "duh" to me and I see very little value in this post.
As far as Google's control extends, I can't think of anything they could implement without flaws that wouldn't be hostile to most of their end users.
If it weren't this flaw, it'd be a "zomg, I can plug a USB key into Alice's computer and install a keylogger".
This is a trivial, routine style of attack and of course it will work against Google's security scheme which is catered towards the everyday Joe and Alice and designed more to protect against phishing.
A better scheme where if you lost your phone, you lose your data forever, would not pass muster with everyday users.
- Piskvorrr 14y agoPhysical access and tampering is conspicuous and suspicious. Rogue-twin WiFi AP is inconspicuous, and few users would suspect anything is amiss.
- neilwillgettoit 14y agoThe best response from Google that could happen here is that they implement a notification feature as to when a OTP is generated.