4 ms·
From Newsome - "Federal law, as implemented by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), already regulates vehicle safety standards, and addin
by almosthere 1y ago
From Newsome - "Federal law, as implemented by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), already regulates vehicle safety standards, and adding California-specific requirements would create a patchwork of regulations that undermines this longstanding federal framework. NHTSA is also actively evaluating intelligent speed assistance systems, and imposing state-level mandates at this time risks disrupting these ongoing federal assessments."
Makes sense, everything else that CA does essentially causes things to cost more. This would be another thing. Not everyone has your salary. That said, I agree with you, cars going that fast are driven by idiot teenagers (or people that want to be a teen again) and are endangering people.
- alistairSH 1y agoThat arguement doesn’t make sense. We (VA) already require ignition interlocks on DUI’s cars. This isn’t much different.
- wffurr 1y agoThe vetoed California law would have required passive ISA, I.e. a dashboard light that comes on when it detects speeding, on all new vehicles sold in California.
- pdonis 1y ago> adding California-specific requirements would create a patchwork of regulations that undermines this longstanding federal framework Which is exactly what California has been doing for decades.