4 ms·
No, but in this case I think it does meet the definition of scam. There is a requirement for diligence, but this requires not being "grossly negligent". Even t
by graemep 2y ago
No, but in this case I think it does meet the definition of scam.
There is a requirement for diligence, but this requires not being "grossly negligent". Even this is waived for people classed as vulnerable (I do not know exactly what that means).