3 ms·
> By comparing the variability in house sizes, scientists could compare the degree of inequality in each society and how it related to population size and polit
by roenxi 2y ago
> By comparing the variability in house sizes, scientists could compare the degree of inequality in each society and how it related to population size and political complexity.
I suspect the study is interesting but that rather undermines the conclusions as relevant in the modern era. The wealth inequality is because house construction isn't a particularly important store of wealth. It is quite difficult to consume a billion dollars worth of house construction; that is skyscraper or Great Pyramid of Giza territory.
You'd miss most of a contemporary billionaire's wealth if you looked mainly at their housing.
- giantg2 2y agoNot to mention, most if the wealth in a primary residence isn't really accessible/utilized. A house bought years ago might appreciate to the point you wouldn't be able to afford it today. But if you sell it, where else are you going to live unless moving to a cheaper area? Then you have people who are house poor vs rich people who live relatively modestly (eg Warren Buffet). And thats all in the US. Other countries/cultures may have different practices that do not tie wealth to large houses.