4 ms·
As a developer I'm totally hoping this format becomes widely adopted. As a pentester I'm looking forward to exploring what the security implications may or may
by tcpiplab 1y ago
As a developer I'm totally hoping this format becomes widely adopted. As a pentester I'm looking forward to exploring what the security implications may or may not be.
Also, I wonder if the syntax is intuitive enough that you could just, for example write a bunch of rules and preferences and such, then attach the file along with your prompt to an LLM and just tell it to follow the rules and logic of the attached config file which is in a new format that the LLM must figure out how to understand. I'll try this.
- tcpiplab 1y agoFWIW Anthropic Claude understood the CONL format just fine. "I was able to understand your configuration file without any difficulty." I dunno what this tells us but I've been wanting to find a simpler syntax for LLM rules. Not a serious project of mine but I have noticed that LLM guardrails of various types are written in many different ways. Some are Markdown-ish or unstructured text strings. Others are somewhat like yaml but contain enough additional complex functionality that you must learn the new language in order to understand the rules you want to write to protect your LLM. For example the syntax used for Nvidia's Nemo Guardrails rules.