4 ms·
I took a photo of my cat inside my house, with nothing from visible except the sky, stripped the EXIF, and it STILL managed to get within a few hundred metres o
by cameronh90 1y ago
I took a photo of my cat inside my house, with nothing from visible except the sky, stripped the EXIF, and it STILL managed to get within a few hundred metres of my location - just by inferring based on my interior design and the layout of my house.
I’m sure there was an element of luck involved but it was still eery.
- paxys 1y agoNot sure if this is true or not but people have pointed out that it uses data from your past conversations to make a guess.
- simonw 1y agoYeah, I had to turn off chat history after I spotted it doing that.
- mimischi 1y agoAlso wondering if, as another commenter mentioned, it might be trying to estimate your location just by network means.
- simonw 1y agoIt absolutely does that - o3 knows your current location based on IP address etc. This means for a fair test you need to use a photo taken nowhere near your current vicinity - that's why I added examples for Madagascar and Buenos Aires at the end of my post: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Apr/26/o3-photo-locations/#update-o3-does-have-rough-location-access https://simonwillison.net/2025/Apr/26/o3-photo-locations/#up...
- cameronh90 1y agoIt’s true. Unfortunately I can’t post proof without doxxing myself obviously, but I understand the skepticism considering I’m not sure I’d believe it if I hadn't seen it myself. I have no memories stored, and in any case it shouldn’t know where I live exactly. The reasoning output didn’t suggest it was relying on any other chat history or information outside the image, but obviously you can’t fully trust it either.