3 ms·
Additional reasons for inaction: 1. They don't know what they can do that will be effective. 2. They don't want to be targeted as dissidents or non-loyalists
by neilv 2y ago
Additional reasons for inaction:
1. They don't know what they can do that will be effective.
2. They don't want to be targeted as dissidents or non-loyalists to the regime.
3. They're drained by their individual economic situations and worries.
4. They're drained by severe disappointment in large swaths of the electorate, and in the failure of checks and balances.
5. Events are so upsetting that they're in denial or consciously avoiding it.
It might be reassuring to see huge protests, but I wouldn't encourage individuals to do that anymore, because most of those people will be identified by the various surveillance technologies that we've built. (Half of the surveillance built by techbros, incidentally.) The identified can then be further suppressed with automation, and the barriers to doing that are much lower than mass physical roundups and concentration camps.
- LorenPechtel 2y agoWorse, I believe anything the average citizen can do will either be ineffective or counterproductive. They are not going to listen to anything other than force and any outside force will simply provide a focus. Thus the force must come from within--law enforcement has to do their job. Or, if they don't, a military coup.