3 ms·
If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic. </quote> http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
by d0mine 18y ago
If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic. </quote> http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- swombat 18y agoIt's probably worth noting, now that this story has been on here for a few hours, that it has produced very little worthwhile discussion - just one mention of some interesting facts about white phosphorous weapons, and a bunch of flame wars about whether this topic is appropriate for HN. Imho that's a good indication that this topic was in fact not appropriate.
- qw 18y agoPerhaps the users value their karma points too much. A lot of votes are based on whether the user agrees with the post, and not based on the value it brings to the discussion.
- unalone 18y agoDo people really value karma on this site? I'd think that the lack of discussion is more because there's not much to be had. There's the anti-Israeli bigotry and the pro-Israeli bigotry, and beyond that there's not much else. You can't debate if it's right of them because most of the end results will be the same (Geneva-convention, no-they-didn't-sign-that-part-of-the-convention, I-still-think-it's-wrong, then the conversation ends). There's nothing much that civilians can discuss here, because none of us are in positions of big know. That's why I'd prefer the discussion focus on other things. Not because these things aren't important, but because the userbase is more interesting discussing other topics.