4 ms·
He mentions this in the same paragraph: > If you’re still suspicious, try stripping EXIF by taking a screenshot and run an experiment yourself—I’ve tried this
by haswell 1y ago
He mentions this in the same paragraph:
> If you’re still suspicious, try stripping EXIF by taking a screenshot and run an experiment yourself—I’ve tried this and it still works the same way.
- suddenlybananas 1y agoWhy didn't he do that then for this post?
- segmondy 1y agoEven better, edit it and place a false location.
- AIPedant 1y agoThis is a good test - the salient point is that it is fine if the LLM is confused, or even gets it wrong! But what I suspect would happen is that it would confabulate details which aren't in the photo to justify the incorrect EXIF answer. This is not fine.
- brookst 1y agoI agree that it is not fine to confabulate details that are not supported by the evidence.
- simonw 1y agoBecause I'd already determined it wasn't using EXIF in prior experiments and didn't bother with the one that I wrote up. I added two examples at the end just now where I stripped EXIF via screenshotting first.