4 ms·

Did someone dig into the UFO files?

by bulla 1y ago

belter 1y ago
Did you notice has we had no more sightings or tic-tac Air Force videos in the last 2 years?
- EA-3167 1y ago
  Probably done testing whatever it was, most likely some kind of tech for drones or maybe even the B-21 or F-47. Just like the "Flying triangles" from back in the 1980's and early 1990's were probably the F-117 and B-2 test articles.
  - SnazzyUncle 1y ago
    The stuff they showed on those videos a few years ago were a lot of the often balloons or children's birthday balloons and the incredible speeds were ~40mph. There is several guys that on YouTube that seriously investigate the UFO sightings and almost all of them are either flares, children's balloons or in some cases people literally filming a reflection of a light fitting in a hotel room.
ta12653421 1y ago
well, the comparison is quite far off the track: in case of Kennedy, there is a real case with whatever information hidden for the last 50 years. in case of UFO, well - we have some smartphone video (which are by coincidence always blurred due to pixels, even on a 8k 2025 device) and some guys claiming whatever topic. so, regarding a possible evidence for (X), i would dig into the former, while the latter would be much more fun
- bigyabai 1y ago
  FWIW, any interesting information about the JFK assassination is still likely withheld. The newly released files still have plenty of redactions and include a warning that they are not every record related to the case. You will probably die before seeing anything surprising come from JFK's CIA folder. > in case of UFO, well - we have some smartphone video We've got FLIR videos too, it's kinda what GOFAST et. al are famous for. Plenty more interesting than the Kennedy files, but that's just my opinion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_UFO_videos https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_UFO_videos
  - markus_zhang 1y ago
    I also believe really interesting things, if there is any, did not leave a trace. People who send assassins towards presidents, if it did happen, probably did not write down their plans in detail. And any agreements between the power groups is most likely oral and "within certain understanding", likely built through generations of common interests.
- nextn 1y ago
  > well, the comparison is quite far off the track: Might not be that far off the track. A post on X says "US Military Intelligence leaders (MJ-12) didn't like this idea because it would antagonize the Extra Terrestrial Biological Entities who inhabited to the dark side of the moon." https://x.com/Andercot/status/1904692633697730644 https://x.com/Andercot/status/1904692633697730644 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gm7T2wBbYAMEN3_?format=jpg&name=small https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gm7T2wBbYAMEN3_?format=jpg&name=...
  - seattle_spring 1y ago
    Zero evidence that the document you're referring to isn't completely fake.
deleted 1y ago
[deleted]

Did someone dig into the UFO files?

by bulla 1y ago

Did someone dig into the UFO files?

belter 1y ago

Did you notice has we had no more sightings or tic-tac Air Force videos in the last 2 years?

EA-3167 1y ago
Probably done testing whatever it was, most likely some kind of tech for drones or maybe even the B-21 or F-47. Just like the "Flying triangles" from back in the 1980's and early 1990's were probably the F-117 and B-2 test articles.
- SnazzyUncle 1y ago
  The stuff they showed on those videos a few years ago were a lot of the often balloons or children's birthday balloons and the incredible speeds were ~40mph. There is several guys that on YouTube that seriously investigate the UFO sightings and almost all of them are either flares, children's balloons or in some cases people literally filming a reflection of a light fitting in a hotel room.

ta12653421 1y ago

well, the comparison is quite far off the track: in case of Kennedy, there is a real case with whatever information hidden for the last 50 years. in case of UFO, well - we have some smartphone video (which are by coincidence always blurred due to pixels, even on a 8k 2025 device) and some guys claiming whatever topic. so, regarding a possible evidence for (X), i would dig into the former, while the latter would be much more fun

bigyabai 1y ago
FWIW, any interesting information about the JFK assassination is still likely withheld. The newly released files still have plenty of redactions and include a warning that they are not every record related to the case. You will probably die before seeing anything surprising come from JFK's CIA folder. > in case of UFO, well - we have some smartphone video We've got FLIR videos too, it's kinda what GOFAST et. al are famous for. Plenty more interesting than the Kennedy files, but that's just my opinion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_UFO_videos https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_UFO_videos
- markus_zhang 1y ago
  I also believe really interesting things, if there is any, did not leave a trace. People who send assassins towards presidents, if it did happen, probably did not write down their plans in detail. And any agreements between the power groups is most likely oral and "within certain understanding", likely built through generations of common interests.
nextn 1y ago
> well, the comparison is quite far off the track: Might not be that far off the track. A post on X says "US Military Intelligence leaders (MJ-12) didn't like this idea because it would antagonize the Extra Terrestrial Biological Entities who inhabited to the dark side of the moon." https://x.com/Andercot/status/1904692633697730644 https://x.com/Andercot/status/1904692633697730644 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gm7T2wBbYAMEN3_?format=jpg&name=small https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gm7T2wBbYAMEN3_?format=jpg&name=...
- seattle_spring 1y ago
  Zero evidence that the document you're referring to isn't completely fake.

deleted 1y ago

[deleted]