2 ms·
Agreed, but the points raised by GP are valid in terms of using that article as an argument that AVX-512 can decode UTF-8 well. It might be fast, but it's not
by magicalhippo 2y ago
Agreed, but the points raised by GP are valid in terms of using that article as an argument that AVX-512 can decode UTF-8 well.
It might be fast, but it's not a UTF-8 decoder. It's a transcoder to a fixed, and very limited, target encoding.
- kjs3 2y agoI though it was pretty clear the GP was talking about Daniels article, not the blog post, but I guess I can see two readings.