5 ms·
They didn't need to search, they just needed to wait outside to arrest. That would have worked if the defendant didn't use the backdoor.
by Jensson 2y ago
They didn't need to search, they just needed to wait outside to arrest. That would have worked if the defendant didn't use the backdoor.
- rolph 2y agoFBI should review thier fieldwork, alternate entrance/exits, must be secured or under watch, before the approach.
- insane_dreamer 2y agoBut they didn't have a valid warrant for arrest. Therefore him going out the back door was not "escaping arrest".
- Jensson 2y agoThey did have a valid warrant for arrest, they just didn't have a warrant to search the courtroom but they had a warrant to arrest the guy as soon as he stepped outside.
- xracy 2y agoThen they weren't obstructed. They're just shit at their job. If I know you're in a building and haver permission to arrest you, it's not "obstructing arrest" if you use the back door. What if your car's parked out back? To quote the 10 year old who destroyed me in fortnite "Get good."
- stackskipton 2y agoI could be if you can't enter a store to arrest someone and back door is marked "private employee only". Manager then let's them out the back door despite clear enforced store policy to prohibit random customers from being allowed in that part of the store.
- fc417fc802 2y agoI don't think the manager (or any other employee) is legally obligated to follow store policy in your example.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]