> The Supreme Court is going to have to clarify the existence or non-existence of constitutional rights for people living here unlawfully. I'm not a lawyer, bu

> The Supreme Court is going to have to clarify the existence or non-existence of constitutional rights for people living here unlawfully. I'm not a lawyer, but... they already have for decades or centuries, and not in the direction that MAGA wants. > “Yes, without question,” said Cristina Rodriguez, a professor at Yale Law School. “Most of the provisions of the Constitution apply on the basis of personhood and jurisdiction in the United States.” > Many parts of the Constitution use the term “people” or “person” rather than “citizen.” Rodriguez said those laws apply to everyone physically on U.S. soil, whether or not they are a citizen. [...] > In the ruling, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote “it is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law in deportation proceedings.” Granted, only that last one is actually the Supreme Court. Perhaps there are hundreds of Supreme Court cases testing individual pieces of the constitution, but as the professor said, for the most part they give all the same rights. MAGA has managed to make everyone doubt and argue over it. The party of "Constitution-lovers" flagrantly violating both the plain wording and decades of legal rulings on the Constitution. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-constitutional-rights-do-undocumented-immigrants-have https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-constitutional-ri...