3 ms·
Umm… why didn’t the agents just wait patiently until the proceeding was done?
by dudeinjapan 1y ago
Umm… why didn’t the agents just wait patiently until the proceeding was done?
- ceejayoz 1y agoI don't think I've ever encountered a CBP employee I'd describe as "patient".
- rolph 1y agoLEOs are trained to "be the one in control"
- duxup 1y agoIt does seem like they could have gotten what they wanted by just trying to do their job a little more such as, waiting.
- pseudo0 1y agoThey did, read the complaint: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wied.111629/gov.uscourts.wied.111629.1.0.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wied.11... The judge got upset that they were waiting in the public hallway outside the courtroom.
- mmooss 1y agoOne side alleges that, to be clear. We haven't heard the judge's version, heard from witnesses, seen evidence, nor had it adjudicated.
- lincon127 1y agoReading through that, it does seem like a very hasty decision on the judge's part. But then again, I don't know what else you're supposed to do if you think the warrant for the arrest is based on an unjust premise (Which Dugan presumably thought, otherwise I have no idea why she'd act the way she did). This does make it pretty clear that the arrest of the judge is justified, unless there are some special provisions for judges that I'm unaware of that allow judges to be exempt from title 18 code 1071 and code 1505, which is entirely possible since the most relevant thing about US law I know is jurisprudence. Barring that possibility, what should be more on the top of everyone's minds is how this is resolved in court.