4 ms·
it was a cf managed waf rule for a vulnerability that doesn't apply to us. we've disabled it.
by nicoledevillers 1y ago
it was a cf managed waf rule for a vulnerability that doesn't apply to us. we've disabled it.
- SonOfLilit 1y agoThis comment deserves to be much higher, assuming this user speaks for Substack (no previous submissions or comments, but the comment implies it).
- nicoledevillers 1y agoi don't speak for substack, but i do work there and changed the WAF rule :)
- silverwind 1y agoWhy not review rules before applying them?