> This makes no sense in Zuckerberg's case: I already agreed with the correction - he has voting control. What is still incorrect is imagining that billions o

> This makes no sense in Zuckerberg's case: I already agreed with the correction - he has voting control. What is still incorrect is imagining that billions of dollars gets you advisors who know how to run a company - and those people aren't just high level executives already running companies. > you're deep in it with your belief that Zuckerberg is an unusually capable operator. The burden is on you to show a successful CEO for over a decade is actually an idiot.