3 ms·

I believe they meant an additional $110, which would be a 110% markup.

• pseudalopex 1y ago
  Why do you believe this?
  • d1sxeyes 1y ago
    Probably because that’s approximately in line with the article.
  • lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 1y ago
    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43787992 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43787992 > of paying $2 to $3 more on a $100 item, not paying $110 more on a $100 item $110 more on a $100 item would be $210. I have no idea where pwg got the “$110 more”, though. Seems the in-context comparison would be “$85 more”.