3 ms·
Why deceptive? It shows how much their revenue was compared to how much they’d have to pay. No judgement, no misleads. Only facts. Anyone who reads can immedia
by signatoremo 1y ago
Why deceptive? It shows how much their revenue was compared to how much they’d have to pay. No judgement, no misleads. Only facts. Anyone who reads can immediately have an idea of their financial strength. How does using profit help as opposed to revenue? And it’s not like FB can only use Canada’s profit to pay for expenses there.
Did you channel your own bias?
- like_any_other 1y ago> It shows how much their revenue was compared to how much they’d have to pay. I bought an oil tanker for $100,000,000, and sold it for $100,020,000. My revenue was $100,020,000, so an extra tax of $400,000 should be no problem for me, right?
- esalman 1y agoIt's billions in revenue vs millions in extra expense. There's the real deception. Even their net income was over 60 billions.