4 ms·
GPT 4.5 seems to get it right, but then repeat the 700 pounds "A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
by Certified 1y ago
GPT 4.5 seems to get it right, but then repeat the 700 pounds
"A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
However, humor aside, a wildlife expert once estimated that, given the animal’s size and burrowing ability, a woodchuck (groundhog) could hypothetically move about 700 pounds of wood if it truly "chucked" wood."
https://chatgpt.com/share/680a75c6-cec8-8012-a573-798d2d8f6bd7 https://chatgpt.com/share/680a75c6-cec8-8012-a573-798d2d8f6b...
- shaftway 1y agoI've heard the answer is "he could cut a cord of conifer but it costs a quarter per quart he cuts".
- CamperBob2 1y agoThat answer is exactly right, and those who say the 700 pound thing is a hallucination are themselves wrong: https://chatgpt.com/share/680aa077-f500-800b-91b4-93dede73370f https://chatgpt.com/share/680aa077-f500-800b-91b4-93dede7337...
- wolfgang42 1y agoLinking to ChatGPT as a “source” is unhelpful, since it could well have made that up too. However, with a bit of digging, I have confirmed that the information it copied from Wikipedia here is correct, though the AP and Spokane Times citations are both derivative sources; Mr. Thomas’s comments were first published in the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, on July 11, 1988: https://democratandchronicle.newspapers.com/search/results/?date-end=1989&date-start=1988&keyword=woodchuck https://democratandchronicle.newspapers.com/search/results/?...
- CamperBob2 1y agoLinking to ChatGPT as a “source” is unhelpful, since it could well have made that up too No, it absolutely is helpful, because it links to its source. It takes a grand total of one additional click to check its answer. Anyone who still complains about that is impossible to satisfy, and should thus be ignored.