4 ms·

Someone made the observation that the problems started when things changed from social networking (family/friend) to social media. From actually keeping up with

Someone made the observation that the problems started when things changed from social networking (family/friend) to social media. From actually keeping up with people to 'keeping up' with content.

Frieren 2y ago
Yes. Social sites had a card blanche to publish anything without consequences because it was user-generated content. Social sites used that power to publish their own stuff under the same protection. That has broken the system. Social media sites are 100% responsible for all the misinformation, scams, and hate that they publish or promote. And they should be legally accountable for it. "We are not accountable because the users are the ones posting the media"... but we post and promote whatever we want is a terrible way for the world to work.
jt2190 2y ago
Turns out most people don’t have a friends and family group that can generate exciting content at a rate that most people want. The platforms oblige this with “reshares” and “you may also like” content, and eventually everyone’s like “who gives a s*t about aunt Millie’s cupcake recipe, check out this dude trying to skateboard off of the Eiffel Tower!”
- LeifCarrotson 2y ago
  A rate people want, or advertisers? I'm sure I could (indeed, I do) get pertinent updates from actual friends and family with <10 minutes of checking messages, voicemails, and emails per day. I wouldn't mind increasing that to 15 minutes if it meant I got a few less relevant but still interesting updates about their lives. But that's way, way under the daily minutes spent by most people on TikTok. And if I wanted/my addiction demanded another hit of that "Oh, neat!" buzz when I'd just put my phone down 10 minutes ago, there's little chance that anyone in my small circle would have posted a single thing in the interval. I don't spend nearly enough time in my group chats to justify Facebook's valuation. And there are no ads (yet, I'm sure they're working on it) in those chats.
- lud_lite 2y ago
  They probably could. If all your friends and family posted 10 times a day. But people prefer to consume I guess.
  - sbarre 2y ago
    Do your friends and family each have 10 things that happen to them every single day that is worth posting to a social network feed?
    - lud_lite 2y ago
      Not to a public feed but certainly to a friends feed. Are there 10 things worth saying a day?
MarceliusK 2y ago
We went from sharing with people we knew to performing for people we don't

Someone made the observation that the problems started when things changed from social networking (family/friend) to social media. From actually keeping up with people to 'keeping up' with content.

Frieren 2y ago

Yes. Social sites had a card blanche to publish anything without consequences because it was user-generated content. Social sites used that power to publish their own stuff under the same protection. That has broken the system. Social media sites are 100% responsible for all the misinformation, scams, and hate that they publish or promote. And they should be legally accountable for it. "We are not accountable because the users are the ones posting the media"... but we post and promote whatever we want is a terrible way for the world to work.

jt2190 2y ago

Turns out most people don’t have a friends and family group that can generate exciting content at a rate that most people want. The platforms oblige this with “reshares” and “you may also like” content, and eventually everyone’s like “who gives a s*t about aunt Millie’s cupcake recipe, check out this dude trying to skateboard off of the Eiffel Tower!”

LeifCarrotson 2y ago
A rate people want, or advertisers? I'm sure I could (indeed, I do) get pertinent updates from actual friends and family with <10 minutes of checking messages, voicemails, and emails per day. I wouldn't mind increasing that to 15 minutes if it meant I got a few less relevant but still interesting updates about their lives. But that's way, way under the daily minutes spent by most people on TikTok. And if I wanted/my addiction demanded another hit of that "Oh, neat!" buzz when I'd just put my phone down 10 minutes ago, there's little chance that anyone in my small circle would have posted a single thing in the interval. I don't spend nearly enough time in my group chats to justify Facebook's valuation. And there are no ads (yet, I'm sure they're working on it) in those chats.
lud_lite 2y ago
They probably could. If all your friends and family posted 10 times a day. But people prefer to consume I guess.
- sbarre 2y ago
  Do your friends and family each have 10 things that happen to them every single day that is worth posting to a social network feed?
  - lud_lite 2y ago
    Not to a public feed but certainly to a friends feed. Are there 10 things worth saying a day?

MarceliusK 2y ago

We went from sharing with people we knew to performing for people we don't