Which problem is this solving? This isn't resurrecting extinct species or truly helping those at risk (both misleading claims made by the company involved), si

Which problem is this solving? This isn't resurrecting extinct species or truly helping those at risk (both misleading claims made by the company involved), since it doesn't address the root causes. Solving problems is not always a good thing if they aren't the right problems, or if it's more of a publicity stunt. Especially when the topic is resource-constrained. At this point, I'm just repeating that the article makes a valid point. I think otherwise, and so I disagree with you on this point. Let me stress, once again, this isn't about "not playing god" -- not yours, but the sibling commenter's remark about Nautilus -- which I'm in full agreement it'd be a silly thing to claim (and which the article doesn't, as far as I can tell). It does seem technological hubris though, and it doesn't really seem about "trying to do good".