4 ms·
Slint is not a replacement for Qt. Slint only provides a tiny fraction of what Qt has to offer https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/modules-cpp.html https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/mo
by 5d41402abc4b 1y ago
Slint is not a replacement for Qt. Slint only provides a tiny fraction of what Qt has to offer https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/modules-cpp.html https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/modules-cpp.html
- jenadine 1y agoOnly the GUI part is relevant for this discussion as this is what Qt is know for. Other modules also have different Rust crates equivalent, or are really niche and nobody uses them.
- jcelerier 1y agothat's really not true. There are thousands of projects using e.g. QtSerialPort (https://github.com/search?q=include+QSerialPort&type=code https://github.com/search?q=include+QSerialPort&type=code) Qt3D (https://github.com/search?q=include+Qt3D&type=code https://github.com/search?q=include+Qt3D&type=code) QtWebSockets (https://github.com/search?q=include+Qt3D&type=code https://github.com/search?q=include+Qt3D&type=code) QtSensors (https://github.com/search?q=include+qtsensors&type=code https://github.com/search?q=include+qtsensors&type=code) Qt SCXML (https://github.com/search?q=include+qstatemachine&type=code https://github.com/search?q=include+qstatemachine&type=code) etc etc.. Qt's value is as an app framework where you can assume interoperation across the same async runtime and enjoy a cohesive set of APIs for all your app's needs.