4 ms·
GPLv3 requires the license to be kept. Seems reportable to the owner of the repo and or GitHub.
by plandis 1y ago
GPLv3 requires the license to be kept. Seems reportable to the owner of the repo and or GitHub.
- DrillShopper 1y agoI'm sure the people who work for an administration that by and large flaunts court orders responsible for this will get right on that.....aaaand it's gone.
- amake 1y agoflouts
- TheDong 1y agoThe only person who has standing to say anything is the original author of the code, the holder of the copyright. It's possible, but very unlikely, the copyright license wasn't actually violated because, for example, the fork could have arranged a separate license. The best example of this is the Qt Project's code: https://www.qt.io/qt-licensing https://www.qt.io/qt-licensing You can get it under a GPL license for free. You can pay them money to get it under a Commercial license that would let you modify the code without releasing changes. So, while I doubt it happened, the person who forked it here could have contacted the original author, the copyright holder, and asked for an exemption from the GPL terms.