2 ms·
As a former student of the author, I don't think he's saying they should be able to avoid jurisdiction. I think he was musing on whether it would even be possib
by otterley 2y ago
As a former student of the author, I don't think he's saying they should be able to avoid jurisdiction. I think he was musing on whether it would even be possible under this new Ninth Circuit framework/test. He concludes it's unlikely, and hence for Shopify (or any other company putting cookies in browsers) to have any chance of avoiding it, they're going to have to appeal to SCOTUS.
- xbar 2y agoNot at all. I think he rightly concludes that jurisdiction is completely avoidable by geoblocking California. It is baffling to hear the author ask the question “did Shopify ‘expressly aim an intentional act at California?” And subsequently conclude that Shopify’s entire business model is in doubt if it doesn’t do business in California.
- adgjlsfhk1 2y agoI think the one plausible argument for Shopify is that the California law is unconstitutional since this might be interstate commerce.
- otterley 2y agoThat’s possible, but they haven’t even gotten there yet because they’re still arguing over the jurisdictional question.
- otterley 2y agoThey’re not going to geo block California customers. It makes no business sense.