the Romney plan does not address how his proposal will be funded and reference the $2.8 Trillion revenue shortfall his plan creates. When the plan is advertise

the Romney plan does not address how his proposal will be funded and reference the $2.8 Trillion revenue shortfall his plan creates. When the plan is advertised as "revenue-neutral" yet does not detail how the $2.8 trillion shortfall will be made up, it's ridiculous to give that plan a serious treatment. It seems highly unfair to compare an ambiguous plan (Romney's) where the only known details are the ones that make the plan look good to a more completely detailed plan (Obama's).