4 ms·
I was surprised at how short the table was, after the note up top about why they needed five lights because the table's so long. It looks way too big for the ta
by alabastervlog 1y ago
I was surprised at how short the table was, after the note up top about why they needed five lights because the table's so long. It looks way too big for the table, its proportions look like it belongs over a table 1.5-2 meters longer.
- draazon 1y agoThat's probably down to the angle; the table is in fact over 3 metres long, and extendable.
- alabastervlog 1y agoAh, OK, that makes more sense then.
- mikepurvis 1y agoI have a 9' dining table as well, and it can definitely be deceptive— mine would absolutely benefit from a "full length" lighting solution like this.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]