I think the argument from Trump's lawyers is more subtle. Certainly editing is allowed-- but deliberately editing out poor answers could be seen as a donation t

I think the argument from Trump's lawyers is more subtle. Certainly editing is allowed-- but deliberately editing out poor answers could be seen as a donation to the campaign. Especially if it's not applied equally. Furthermore, it could be said to be infringing on the public's right to know by conspiring to withhold material facts. I'm not saying I agree with any of this. Only that news organizations play with fire when they consciously abandon neutrality.