4 ms·
Global Warming is a Theory that's of very high consensus in the scientific community. We're not talking Theory of Evolution levels of crazy acceptance, but far
by gte910h 14y ago
Global Warming is a Theory that's of very high consensus in the scientific community. We're not talking Theory of Evolution levels of crazy acceptance, but far higher levels of acceptance than many things you act on every day.
Both are proven to a far higher level than many semiconductor models used to build chips you are probably using to make that post.
The news media however, does not report the consensus (on either of those), I am sorry they have mislead you.
[1] Source http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/publications/downloads/boykoff04-gec.pdf http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/publications/downloads/boykoff04-gec...
- ten_fingers 14y agoFollowing your reference, I see: > During this time, top climate change scientists from around the globe—comprising the United Nations-sponsored Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)— improved understanding of global warming, and produced three major reports and many related documents. Tilt! They "improved" nothing! Total, reeking garbage. We're talking Ramaswamy's 'radiative forcing' which is clever terminology but simplistic nonsense. The IPCC is mostly just a political organization. Its 'science' is just junk, deliberately so. The "consensus" of the 'climate science' community is inevitable, given the funding and review processes, and meaningless. Moreover, for the main issue of CO2 from human activity causing significant global warming, 'climate science' has no significant science -- the issue is too difficult. See my posts Part I and Part II in this thread. Sorry you've been taken in by the IPCC rip-off, flim-flam, fraud scam.