4 ms·
The way the language is evolving, it seems likely to me that people in the applications camp (ML, simple web-dev, etc.) will soon need a "simple Python" fork or
by macleginn 1y ago
The way the language is evolving, it seems likely to me that people in the applications camp (ML, simple web-dev, etc.) will soon need a "simple Python" fork or at least an agreed-upon subset of the language that doesn't have most of these complications (f-strings are a major success, though).
- globular-toast 1y agoThe only newish thing on this list appears to be structural pattern matching. Other than that it's all typing stuff which is all optional.
- sgarland 1y agoNothing stops you from simply not using features, and even having CI checks that forbid them. Not sure why you’d need a fork.