You seem to misunderstand my previous comment and also the thing being criticized by the post I replied to. I understand that there are fuzzy tasks that AIs/al

You seem to misunderstand my previous comment and also the thing being criticized by the post I replied to. I understand that there are fuzzy tasks that AIs/algorithms are terrible at, which seem really simple for a human mind, and this hasn't gone away with the latest generations of LLMs. That's fine and I wouldn't criticize an AI for failing at something like the instructions you describe, for example. However in this case, the human was asking for very specific, cut and dry information from easily available NFL rosters. Again, if an AI fails at that, especially because you didn't phrase the question "just so", then sorry, but no, it's not much more trustworthy for deep research and data scientist inquiries. What in any case makes you think the data scientists will use superior phrasing to tease better results under more complexity from an LLM?