4 ms·
Which is not exactly efficient. 40C or less is desirable.
by looofooo0 1y ago
Which is not exactly efficient. 40C or less is desirable.
- sokoloff 1y agoMy return water temps are 115F (46C) on a P98 design heating day, and obviously cooler on warmer than design days. Cooler is always better, but "baseboards require 180F [82C] water because that's what's on the spec sheet" is a commonly-held but mistaken belief.
- looofooo0 1y agoThis is bad. Return water should be less 35 degree max. Actually 30 degree after the heat pump would be ideal: https://www.flow30.de/ https://www.flow30.de/
- jillyboel 1y ago[citation needed]
- looofooo0 1y agoAh this is school knowledge of thermodynamics: the smaller the delta the more efficient the heat pump. For human comfort look at the iso7730. Also the system is self regulatory with such low temps.
- Retric 1y agoHeat pumps and furnaces behave very differently here. For a furnace you’re talking fractions of a percent difference in efficiency across a wide temperature range so by far the most critical issue is total heat losses to the outside. A heat pump’s efficiency is far more variable making total losses to the outside less important.
- looofooo0 1y agoFirst, sooner or later you have to replace your furnace with a heat pump. Second, modern furnaceses are condensing. Return temp should be as low as possible maximise condensing.
- Retric 1y agoWe agree return temps should be lower, but to determine how critical this is you need to out numbers on that. In steady state operation at maximum load a difference in return temperatures of 15f is ~1% efficiency. But steady state at maximum load is an extreme situation the average return temperature is well below that theoretical maximum thus an even wider difference is needed for a seasonal difference of 1%. Redundancy is critical in areas that get really cold. That may eventually mean turning to hydrogen, but a backup gas furnace for a well insulated home really isn’t a major CO2 contributor. More relevant to the discussion it further reduces the impact of minor changes in efficiency or comfort.
- looofooo0 1y agoAs said, at some point you will likely replace your furnace by a heat pump. Then all investment to low temperatures will pay off. A modern gas furnace is no backup for a heat pump, as it also needs electricity. I would recommend a low tech solution like a wood stove for backup. I have one in my cellar. In case of a long power outage I would likely just install this through some open window and do some redneck stuff to make it airtight.
- Retric 1y agoTrusting in the power grid for both is obviously not redundant, but it’s cheaper to get independent power for a furnace than heat pumps. Actual redundancy means you want completely independent systems so you shouldn’t then use the same heat delivery loops/pumps/fans either. Wood stoves require you to physically be home and are kind of a pain to use thus make a poor backup on their own, though a solid 2nd backup. PS: Most areas are better off with solar thermal + heat pumps. Solar thermal however requires sunlight which not everyone gets in the depth of winter.