4 ms·
You make it sound like it’s a binary situation where in one case it doesn’t matter and in the other it’s No Problem. I think both are wrong. An unsuccessful pr
by tobr 1y ago
You make it sound like it’s a binary situation where in one case it doesn’t matter and in the other it’s No Problem. I think both are wrong.
An unsuccessful project might be unsuccessful because it got eaten by costs before it became successful.
A wildly successful project is risky to migrate.
- tppiotrowski 1y agoThe YC crowd seems to think the only worthwhile businesses are worth $1 billion+ otherwise why bother
- islewis 1y agoIf you are trying to commercialize something, a popular project with bad margins is a better spot to be in than an unsuccessful project with good margins. If it's a personal learning project, that might not be the case.
- tppiotrowski 1y agoCounterexample: https://x.com/levelsio/status/1730659933232730443 https://x.com/levelsio/status/1730659933232730443
- jmathai 1y agoI don’t think that’s a counter example. If hood maps shows a lot of potential then the $11k is something to figure out. If not, then it’s poor price controls. IIUC Pieter Levels talks a lot about not prematurely optimizing engineering solutions because most ideas will flop.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- slashdev 1y agoI strongly disagree with this. Most startups fail. Optimizing for getting revenue is more important than optimizing cost in the beginning. If you get revenue you can solve the cost problem. If you don’t, it doesn’t matter. Anything that gives you more shots at the goal is a win in a startup.
- intrasight 1y agoThese cloud back and stacks are very cheap at low volume and honestly I expect them to remain so or even go down in price. I've seen many colleagues bootstrap something - even if they're not themselves very technical - because they've leveraged these well integrated low cost platforms.
- jmathai 1y agoI do think it’s binary. The project either shows potential to meet your goal or it doesn’t. I think it’s rare that fails to show potential because of the underlying technology that’s chosen. Sure, Vercel is relatively expensive. But I just don’t see how you’d throw in the towel because the costs are too high without first evaluating how to lower them. If you’re saying that the evaluation is likely to show that you’re stuck - I have never seen that be the case personally.