4 ms·
Indirectly is sufficient. You're paying for it to happen.
by renewiltord 2y ago
Indirectly is sufficient. You're paying for it to happen.
- johnisgood 2y agoYeah, but try not paying taxes. :/ You pay taxes even when you buy products at the grocery stores, too.
- renewiltord 2y agoIndeed. Hence "just following orders". Ultimately, I don't believe in this kind of strong culpability but it's clear the people who claim they do don't either and just bring it up when convenient.
- johnisgood 2y agoDo you have any solutions?
- renewiltord 2y agoYes, have a moral philosophy which does not lead to total contamination across the interaction graph. It’s okay to pay taxes into the US Government even if some representatives of it act poorly.
- johnisgood 2y agoBut you said "Indirectly is sufficient. You're paying for it to happen.", when I was talking about taxes. What if I have a moral philosophy but my taxes still go to whatever is we are being against? I am indirectly paying for it, but it is coercion, IMO. The "vote for someone else" does not play here, another head of the same dragon.
- renewiltord 2y agoI was taking that position to illustrate that moral contagion inevitably leads to a declaration of everyone being immoral. Therefore, moral contagion is not a useful differentiator between people. Reductio ad absurdum.