4 ms·
No, if you look at statistics like ww2, most harm to soldiers was inflicted by artillery.
by looofooo0 1y ago
No, if you look at statistics like ww2, most harm to soldiers was inflicted by artillery.
- benterix 1y ago>> These artillery shells are mostly for destroying equipment and structures not people. > No, if you look at statistics like ww2, most harm to soldiers was inflicted by artillery. These two statements are not mutually exclusive.
- looofooo0 1y agoMaybe, but the existing of air burst artillery and cluster munition is not supporting this claim. Also, the digging of foxholes is done also partially to greatly decrease effectiveness of artillery fire.