2 ms·

Funny you mention that… I have a DS1515+ which has an SSD cache function that uses a whitelisted set of known good drives that function well. If you plug in a

Funny you mention that… I have a DS1515+ which has an SSD cache function that uses a whitelisted set of known good drives that function well. If you plug in a non whitelisted ssd and try to use it as a cache, it pops up a stern warning about potential data loss due to unsupported drives with a checkbox to acknowledge that you’re okay with the risk. So…there’s really no excuse why they couldn’t have done this for regular drives.

spease 1y ago
That assumes that the person setting up the NAS is the same person using it, which is not going to be the case for non-tech-savvy users. Everyone will understand it costing more, fewer people will understand why the NAS ate their data without the warning it was supposed to provide, because cheap drives that didn’t support certain metrics were used. If Synology wants to have there be only one way that the device behaves, they have to put constraints on the hardware.