I read your (excellent) blog post just now. This reminds me very much of the Apple "Do you want to share your location" feature. Do you think that this practic

I read your (excellent) blog post just now. This reminds me very much of the Apple "Do you want to share your location" feature. Do you think that this practically limits the usefulness of an LLM "agent"? In your email example it is all well and good for me to check it is indeed sending to bob@mycompany.com and confirm it as trusted from now on, but what if my agent is doing something with lots of code or a lengthy legal document etc.. Am I right in thinking I'd have to meticulously check these and confirm they are correct (as the end user)? If that's the case, even in the email example many users probably wouldn't notice bob@mycumpany.com. Equally, this feels like it would be a non-starter for cron-like, webhook-like, or long-running flows (basically anywhere the human isn't already naturally in the loop). P.S. They must have called it CaMeL for the two LLMs/humps, otherwise it is the most awful backronym I've ever seen!