> The media is irate and resentful for having been flummoxed by some no-good knave. (third paragraph of the article notes several of them - Vogue, Metro, Cosmop

> The media is irate and resentful for having been flummoxed by some no-good knave. (third paragraph of the article notes several of them - Vogue, Metro, Cosmopolitan, the i newspaper, the Express, Hello!, the Telegraph, the Daily Star, the Daily Mail, the Sun, and the BBC) The third paragraph says nothing about irate or resentful (see below), nor does any other part of the article. Did you - the great journalism critic - fabricate it? The case has been described as a wake-up call for newsrooms, as AI tools make it far easier for bad actors to invent supposed experts for their own purposes. Santini’s output has been prolific, with comments in Vogue, Metro, Cosmopolitan, the i newspaper, the Express, Hello!, the Telegraph, the Daily Star, the Daily Mail and the Sun in recent years. She was also quoted in an article for the BBC’s international site, BBC.com. > I beg to differ, and since i am very bored, I had the 3 minutes to find these. ... There are thousands of articles a day, maybe tens of thousands, in the high-quality professional media. You naming a few with errors from a ten years period doesn't amount to much. > It is no great mystery why journalists so rarely turn their pens against their own. A conspiracy! Do you have evidence? You criticize the journalists for a lack of accuracy and research - where is yours? Here's some evidence the other way: Fox constantly attacks publications that differ politically; Fox's errors are reported widely; today's NYT reports on a libel suit against itself; regarding this particular error: "Questions over Santini were first raised by the Press Gazette." How do you know about the errors? Where did you find the errors listed above?