> I agree for method-level changes, but the more you’re willing to cede control for larger changes, even in a familiar language, the more an LLM accelerates you

> I agree for method-level changes, but the more you’re willing to cede control for larger changes, even in a familiar language, the more an LLM accelerates you. Another way to phrase this is: I agree for method-level changes, but the more you’re willing to cede *understanding* for larger changes, even in a familiar language, the more an LLM accelerates you *to an opaque change set*. Without understanding, the probability of a code generation tool introducing significant defects approaches 1.