3 ms·
Sure. I understand. My work is with DSLs: domain specific languages. The work is in the idea realm (most of the time is spent there), not the source code imple
by alganet 2y ago
Sure. I understand.
My work is with DSLs: domain specific languages. The work is in the idea realm (most of the time is spent there), not the source code implementation, which is often trivial once the language is developed.
The gratification also is different. Seeing others use the language is the best one can hope to achieve nowadays. Maybe publish a book about it, but that sounds more trouble than it is worth (judging by how books on patterns, a similar realm, are often misquoted and misused).
That's why all this talk about licenses sounds like nonsense.
- pabs3 2y agoIdeas are not copyrightable, so you can't prevent anyone from using them without keeping them secret, and even then folks might come up with the same idea independently.
- alganet 2y agoThey are patentable though. Feels like you should have mentioned it. I could have kept it a secret and made a book about it, tying my name to it forever. However, I want my domain specific languages to run free. People not getting in my nerves about them anymore would be enough compensation.
- pabs3 2y agoTrue, although software patents aren't supposed to be a thing in some places, so your success in protecting software ideas might be location dependent, or time dependent as case law changes. Thats probably why I forgot about them.