3 ms·

I am not a fan of these sites. One day I discovered that me and my family (wife, children) were added by some random dude without asking me if I agreed. I coul

• lcall 2y ago
  There is another called familysearch.org which is free and allows adding but not publicly viewing info on living persons. The site is backed by an institution with staying power, has many helpful resources for research, and also has a wiki-like approach to building a single family tree for humanity. (I used to work there.)
  • bigjimmyk3 2y ago
    I agree that familysearch.org is a goldmine for primary sources, I'm very grateful for their digitization initiatives. I'm also glad that there are multiple non-dark-patterned options for people who want to preserve their family history.
• bigjimmyk3 2y ago
  WT's process for living persons attempts to head this off. It's not perfect, but I think it's a pretty good method. When you enter data about a living person, you are required to include an email which "invites" that person to WikiTree. If they don't respond within 30 days, their record (which was already private) is anonymized to last name and decade of birth. Each record's privacy is configurable by its maintainer, or by those to whom the maintainer has granted access. Obviously there are ways to goof this up or act maliciously, but I don't think the site makes intentional doxxing any easier than it already was.