3 ms·
No. Using soft language about someone else's words is not the same as using soft language about torture. It's not even remotely similar. There isn't some transi
by wat10000 2y ago
No. Using soft language about someone else's words is not the same as using soft language about torture. It's not even remotely similar. There isn't some transitive property of outrage here. If you can't tell the difference between saying "these terrorists had reasonable motivations for murdering those innocent people" and "at least that guy's awful statement has one thing going for it" then I really can't help you.
- Lionga 2y agoIf you can say that a statement that justifies killing innocent people because they draw a caricature had "one thing going for it" then I really can't help you.