3 ms·
Events remain a useful technical mechanism to transmit state and data among application resources but they are a miserable experience for developers and operato
by mpalmer 2y ago
Events remain a useful technical mechanism to transmit state and data among application resources but they are a miserable experience for developers and operators alike. Events:
- Put application state and data in dozens of queues that make the application prone to failures, race conditions and incorrect results
- Force developers to think and program asynchronously which is more complex and time consuming than synchronous code
- Require developers know more than just their portion of the code and application domain: they also need to understand how to work with queues, caches and event schemas
- Make applications difficult to troubleshoot as there is no one place to understand the state and data for an application
I say this as someone genuinely interested in this pattern, and in software solutions like Skip: "events" aren't responsible for any of these problems; technical leads producing questionable system designs are.
On their own, additional dependencies won't solve problems inherent in the skills/experience/makeup of your team. Open source is great, but projects come and go, and newer ones come with more risk.
---
Side note: the only content on the homepage is a button that says "Skip Overview", which is very funny.